La irrigación transanal como opción terapéutica para los pacientes con incontinencia y estreñimiento crónico severo refractarios a primera línea / Transanal irrigation as a therapeutic option for patients with incontinence and severe chronic constipation refractory to first line treatment

Introducción: El objetivo es evaluar la utilidad de la irrigación transanal como tratamiento de la incontinencia y estreñimiento crónico severo refractario a primera línea terapéutica, y valorar su impacto en la sintomatología y calidad de vida. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo descriptivo de pacientes con incontinencia y estreñimiento crónico que han iniciado irrigación transanal en dos hospitales de la región. Se recogen variables sociodemográficas, comorbilidades, tratamientos previos, pruebas realizadas, parámetros e incidencias durante la irrigación, puntuación en las escalas de gravedad de incontinencia y estreñimiento de la Cleveland Clinic y calidad de vida EuroQol-5D antes y después del tratamiento. Resultados: Un total de 40 pacientes, 20 con incontinencia y 20 con estreñimiento crónico. Tras una media de 9 meses de tratamiento, en 14 pacientes con incontinencia hemos objetivado una media de mejoría de 7,45 puntos pre-post tratamiento en la escala de gravedad de incontinencia de la Cleveland Clinic, y una media de mejoría en la calidad de vida de 23 puntos pre-post tratamiento en la escala EQ5D (p<0,001); y en 16 pacientes con estreñimiento una media de mejoría de 7,6 puntos pre-post tratamiento en la escala de gravedad de estreñimiento de la Cleveland Clinic, y una media de mejoría en la calidad de vida de 31,5 puntos pre-post tratamiento en la escala EQ5D (p<0,001). Conclusiones: La irrigación transanal es una terapia efectiva para pacientes con incontinencia y estreñimiento crónico no respondedores a primera línea terapéutica. Es sencilla, autoadministrable y segura. Cuando el paciente aprende a emplearla, mejora su sintomatología y calidad de vida. (AU)

Introduction: The aim is to evaluate the utility of transanal irrigation such as treatment of incontinence and severe chronic constipation which is refractory to first-line therapy, and to assess its impact into the symptomatology and quality of life. Methods: Observational retrospective study of patients with incontinence and chronic constipation that had initiated transanal irrigation in two hospitals of the region. We collect sociodemographic variables, comorbidity, previous treatments, tests, parameters and incidences during the irrigation, and punctuation in the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence and Constipation Scores and EuroQol-5D Quality Of Life Scale before and after the treatment. Results: 40 patients, 20 with incontinence and 20 with chronic constipation. After an average period of 9 months of treatment, in 14 patients with incontinence we have observed a mean clinical improvement of 7,45 points before-after treatment measured with Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score, and a mean improvement of 23 points in their quality of life before-after treatment measured with EQ5D Scale (p<0.001); and in 16 patients with constipation a mean clinical improvement of 7,6 points before-after treatment measured with Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score, and a mean improvement of 31,5 points in their quality of life before-after treatment measured with EQ5D Scale (p<0.001). Conclusions: Transanal irrigation is an effective therapy for patients with incontinence and chronic constipation that are refractory to first-line therapies. It's an easy, self-administered and safe procedure. When the patient learns how to use it, the symptomatology and quality of life are improved. (AU)

Transanal irrigation as a therapeutic option for patients with incontinence and severe chronic constipation refractory to first-line treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The aim is to evaluate the utility of transanal irrigation such as treatment of incontinence and severe chronic constipation which is refractory to first-line therapy, and to assess its impact into the symptomatology and quality of life. METHODS: Observational retrospective study of patients with incontinence and chronic constipation that had initiated transanal irrigation in two hospitals of the region. We collect sociodemographic variables, comorbidity, previous treatments, tests, parameters and incidences during the irrigation, and punctuation in the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence and Constipation Scores and EuroQol-5D Quality Of Life Scale before and after the treatment. RESULTS: 40 patients, 20 with incontinence and 20 with chronic constipation. After an average period of 9 months of treatment, in 14 patients with incontinence we have observed a mean clinical improvement of 7,45 points before-after treatment measured with Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score, and a mean improvement of 23 points in their quality of life before-after treatment measured with EQ5D Scale (P < .001); and in 16 patients with constipation a mean clinical improvement of 7,6 points before-after treatment measured with Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score, and a mean improvement of 31,5 points in their quality of life before-after treatment measured with EQ5D Scale (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Transanal irrigation is an effective therapy for patients with incontinence and chronic constipation that are refractory to first-line therapies. It's an easy, self-administered and safe procedure. When the patient learns how to use it, the symptomatology and quality of life are improved.

Duplicación quística de colon en adulto / Colonic duplication cyst in adult

No disponible

Neumatosis quística intestinal, causa infrecuente de neumoperitoneo / Pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis. Uncommon cause of pneumoperitoneum

No disponible

Colecistitis agudas: ¿está justificado hoy en día diferir la cirugía? / Acute cholecystitis: is it still justified to delay surgery?

Introducción: El tratamiento de la colecistitis aguda puede ser inicialmente quirúrgico o conservador con cirugía posterior, revisamos los casos encontrados en nuestro centro, cómo fueron tratados y la evolución de los mismos. Material y métodos: Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo del tratamiento realizado en 178 pacientes con colecistitis aguda durante un año. Se evalúan variables relacionadas con las características de los pacientes, clínica y exploración, técnicas diagnósticas, tratamiento realizado y evolución. Resultados: El 70,2% es tratado de forma conservadora (grupo A) y el 29,8% es intervenido en las primeras 72h (grupo B). En el grupo A se trataron 96 casos con antibioterapia, 15 con antibioterapia y colecistostomía y 12 con antibioterapia y CPRE. En el grupo B se realizó colecistectomía urgente laparoscópica en el 60,4% de los casos y abierta en el 35,8%. En el grupo A el tiempo de ingreso fue de 11 días, con evolución satisfactoria en el 79,2%, tasa de mortalidad del 5,6% y tasa de reingresos del 10,7%. En el grupo B el tiempo quirúrgico fue de 111+/−43, una media de 8,7 días de ingreso, no precisaron tratamiento además de la cirugía el 68% de los casos. La evolución fue satisfactoria en todos los casos menos en 7, no hubo mortalidad en este grupo. Tuvimos una tasa de reingreso del 2%. Conclusiones: Continuamos realizando una proporción importante de tratamiento conservador en detrimento de la cirugía urgente, en números absolutos este parece tener mayor tasa de complicaciones, de mortalidad y de tiempo de ingreso hospitalario (AU)

Introduction: Acute cholecystitis treatment may initially be surgical or conservative with subsequent surgery; we reviewed the cases found in our centre, including their treatment and outcome. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of treatment in 178 patients with acute cholecystitis during one year. We evaluated variables associated with patient characteristics, as well as clinical data, diagnostic tests, treatment and outcome. Results: The majority (70.2%) was treated conservatively (group A), and 29.8% were operated on in the first 72h (group B). In group A, 96 patients were treated with antibiotics, 15 with antibiotic therapy and cholecystectomy, and 12 with antibiotics and ERCP. In group B urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 60.4%, and 35.8% had open cholecystectomy. In group A, admission time was 11 days, with satisfactory progress in 79.2%, mortality rate of 5.6% and 10.7% of readmissions. In group B, operation time was 111 +/− 43min, a mean of 8.7 days hospital stay, and 68% of cases did not require further treatment after surgery. Outcome was satisfactory in all but 7, there was no mortality in this group. We had a return rate of 2%. Conclusions: A significant proportion of conservative treatment was carried out at the expense of emergency surgery, although in absolute numbers conservative treatment seems to have a higher rate of complications, mortality and hospitalisation time(AU)

[Acute cholecystitis: is it still justified to delay surgery?]. / Colecistitis agudas: ¿está justificado hoy en día diferir la cirugía?

INTRODUCTION: Acute cholecystitis treatment may initially be surgical or conservative with subsequent surgery; we reviewed the cases found in our centre, including their treatment and outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of treatment in 178 patients with acute cholecystitis during one year. We evaluated variables associated with patient characteristics, as well as clinical data, diagnostic tests, treatment and outcome. RESULTS: The majority (70.2%) was treated conservatively (group A), and 29.8% were operated on in the first 72 h (group B). In group A, 96 patients were treated with antibiotics, 15 with antibiotic therapy and cholecystectomy, and 12 with antibiotics and ERCP. In group B urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 60.4%, and 35.8% had open cholecystectomy. In group A, admission time was 11 days, with satisfactory progress in 79.2%, mortality rate of 5.6% and 10.7% of readmissions. In group B, operation time was 111 +/- 43 min, a mean of 8.7 days hospital stay, and 68% of cases did not require further treatment after surgery. Outcome was satisfactory in all but 7, there was no mortality in this group. We had a return rate of 2%. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of conservative treatment was carried out at the expense of emergency surgery, although in absolute numbers conservative treatment seems to have a higher rate of complications, mortality and hospitalisation time.

[Caecal volvulus: presentation of 18 cases and review of literature]. / Vólvulo de ciego: presentación de 18 casos y revisión de la literatura.

INTRODUCTION: Caecal volvulus is the second most frequent location of colonic volvulus after sigmoid colon. It usually shows up as bowel obstruction. MATERIAL Y METHOD: We review our experience of 18 cases of cecal volvulus treated in our centre between 1987 and 2007. RESULTS: We studied 8 males (44.4%) and 10 females (55.6%), with a mean age of 63.3 years. As an associated factor it was noted that 10 patients (55.6%) were bedridden. The most common clinical signs were abdominal distension and tenderness, constipation and vomiting. Simple abdominal X-rays have a low diagnostic accuracy, though they reveal a bowel obstruction. Only 1 patient underwent elective surgery. In 10 patients (55.6%) a right hemicolectomy was performed, in 3 (16.8%) cecostomy, in 3 cecopexy and in 2 (11.2%) devolvulation only. There were complications in 3 patients (16.8%), 2 prolonged ileus and 1 wound infection. There were no recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Caecal volvulus is an emergency pathology, requiring surgical treatment. Right hemicolectomy is the treatment of choice both in viable and gangrenous colon. Caecostomy is an alternative treatment in the high risk patient with a viable colon.

Vólvulo de ciego: presentación de 18 casos y revisión de la literatura / Caecal volvulus: Presentation of 18 cases and review of literature

Introducción: el vólvulo de ciego es la segunda localización más frecuente de vólvulos de colon tras el colon sigmoide. Produce habitualmente un cuadro de obstrucción intestinal. Material y método: revisamos nuestra experiencia de 18 casos diagnosticados y tratados de vólvulo de ciego desde 1987 hasta 2007.Resultados: estudiamos a 8 varones (44,4%) y 10 mujeres (55,6%), con una media de edad de 63,3 años. Como factor relacionado encontramos que 10 (55,6%) pacientes tuvieron un encamamiento prolongado. Las manifestaciones clínicas más frecuentes fueron dolor y distensión abdominal, vómitos y ausencia de deposición y ventoseo. La radiografía de abdomen tiene poca rentabilidad diagnóstica, aunque orienta a un cuadro de obstrucción intestinal. Sólo 1 paciente fue intervenido de forma programada. En 10 (55,6%) pacientes se realizó una hemicolectomía derecha; en 3 (16,8%), cecostomía; en otros 3, cecopexia y en 2 (11,2%), desvolvulación simple. Aparecieron complicaciones en 3 (16,8%) pacientes, 2 íleos prolongados y 1 infección de herida. No hubo recidivas. Conclusiones: el vólvulo de ciego es una afección urgente, que suele requerir tratamiento quirúrgico. La hemicolectomía derecha es la técnica de elección tanto cuando el colon es viable como cuando está gangrenado. La cecostomía es una técnica alternativa en pacientes con alto riesgo quirúrgico y colon no isquémico (AU)

Introduction: Caecal volvulus is the second most frequent location of colonic volvulus after sigmoid colon. It usually shows up as bowel obstruction. Material y method: We review our experience of 18 cases of cecal volvulus treated in our centre between 1987 and 2007.Results: We studied 8 males (44.4%) and 10 females (55.6%), with a mean age of 63.3 years. As an associated factor it was noted that 10 patients (55.6%) were bedridden. The most common clinical signs were abdominal distensión and tenderness, constipation and vomiting. Simple abdominal X-rays have a low diagnostic accuracy, though they reveal a bowel obstruction. Only 1 patient underwent elective surgery. In 10 patients (55.6%) a right hemicolectomy was performed, in 3 (16.8%) cecostomy, in 3 cecopexy and in 2 (11.2%) devolvulation only. There were complications in 3 patients (16.8%), 2 prolonged ileus and 1 wound infection. There were no recurrences. Conclusions: Caecal volvulus is an emergency pathology, requiring surgical treatment. Right hemicolectomy is the treatment of choice both in viable and gangrenous colon. Caecostomy is an alternative treatment in the high risk patient with a viable colon (AU)

[Post trauma diaphragmatic hernia]. / Hernia diafragmática postraumática.

UNLABELLED: Posttraumatic diaphragmatic hernias may occur after blunt or penetrating trauma. Due to coexisting injuries and the silent nature of the diaphragmatic lesions, the diagnosis can sometimes be missed in the acute phase and may present later on with obstructive symptoms due to incarcerated organs in the diaphragmatic defect. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We perform a retrospective study of all operated cases at our institution during the last 20 years. RESULTS: 23 patients were included, 17 men and 6 women. 21 patients presented antecedents of blunt trauma and 2 of penetrating one. 7 patients were diagnosed in acute phase, manifesting as acute abdomen and hemodynamic instability. 13 patients were diagnosed in chronic phase, 4 of them with respiratory symptoms and 9 with bowel obstruction symptoms. 3 patients were asymptomatic and the diagnosis was an incidental finding. 12 patients underwent elective surgery and 11 emergency surgery, 7 of them in acute phase and 4 in chronic complicated one. Abdominal approach was performed in all the patients. Laparoscopic approach was unsuccessfully tried in one patient. The hernia was located in the left hemidiaphragm in 16 patients, in the right one in 6 and in one case the defect was bilateral. Mesh was placed in only 2 cases. Intraoperative mortality appeared in one patient with acute diaphragmatic hernia due to coexisting hepatic lesions and morbidity appeared in only 1 patients, presented as a respiratory sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Posttraumatic diaphragmatic hernia is a rare clinical entity of difficult diagnosis. In the chronic phase, there is a high risk of visceral strangulation or respiratory symptoms.